Ostracod valves as efficient UV protection

Submitted: 18 January 2012
Accepted: 18 January 2012
Published: 19 January 2012
Abstract Views: 2344
PDF: 805
HTML: 588
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

One of the major consequences of climate change is the increase of ultraviolet radiation, especially UVB (280-315 nm). This has important consequences for organisms and ecosystems. In surface freshwater ecosystems with transparent water, UV can easily penetrate deeply. Here, we used three different experimental approaches to examine the response of non-marine ostracods and cladocerans to UVB radiation: estimating lethal doses, determining how much UVB is blocked by the valves, and analysing valve chemical compositions. For most investigated crustaceans, we found a strong correlation between the amount of UVB that is blocked by the valves and the lethal UVB doses. Most ostracod valves blocked between 60% and 80% of UVB radiation, thus providing effective shielding. Pigmented species from temporary habitats were best protected. These species also showed high lethal UVB doses of 110 kJ m 2 to 214 kJ m 2. In the waterflea Daphnia magna, valves only stopped ca 35% of UVB radiation, and the lethal dose was half that of the doses estimated for ostracods. Since there were no significant differences in chemical composition of the valves between the investigated species, other factors must be responsible for the observed differences, which remain to be identified.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Van Den Broecke, Lynn, Koen Martens, Valentina Pieri, and Isa Schön. 2012. “Ostracod Valves As Efficient UV Protection”. Journal of Limnology 71 (1):e12. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2012.e12.

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo